Statement on Legal Action to Protect My Reputation

I am pursuing legal remedies regarding slanderous defamatory statements made about me in Septemberof 2025. Anyone who directly or indirectly participated in spreading false claims will be named as appropriate under the law. I will not discuss specifics publicly, other than to say the following: 

The appropriate filings and notices to be served are forthcoming. 

This action is intended to hold accountable those who disseminated false and damaging information in an attempt to assassinate my credentials and reputation. Those who acted directly, and those who aided or encouraged the spread of these statements, will be included in the litigation where the law permits. 

I take this seriously and will pursue justice through the courts. Those who chose to spread false claims either directly or indirectly, should understand that their actions have consequences under both civil and criminal law. 

I will not settle with any of those involved. I will NOT settle for anything less than the maximum relief such civil and criminal litigation actions will allow. 

DEFAMATION SUIT DISMISSED

In filings in Bret Gordon’s defamation suit dated February 27, 2026, the plaintiff’s  effectively acknowledges that the defendant, Dale Dugas, raised allegations of Bret Gordon’s alleged unlawful conduct as part of his defense and criticism. The filing notably frames Dale Dugas’s actions as “outing” or bringing forward this information, rather than inventing it, or actual defamation. This is an important distinction that ties the disputed statements directly to claims about Gordon’s own conduct.

Attorneys are ethically required to present facts to the court with candor. Accordingly, plaintiff’s counsel could not plausibly portray Gordon as free of relevant legal issues while simultaneously addressing allegations involving criminal conduct or ongoing investigations. The filing itself references investigations by Alabama authorities multiple times, underscoring their relevance to the case.

In effect, the plaintiff’s own submissions placed before the court the existence of serious allegations and legal scrutiny, while characterizing the defendant’s role as one of disclosure rather than fabrication or defamation.

For over 5 years the Plaintiffs produced no evidence of actual defamation nor any proof of the plaintiff's many martial arts claims in their own defamation suit. 

In October of 2025 a notice of Failure to Prosecute was issued to the plaintiff's by the courts. 

According to court records, 5/8/2026, Gordons lawsuit, Lake County case number 35‑2020‑CA‑001851, was dismissed and closed by the judge (see below). Follow Link below and search records by using above case number ; https://courtrecords.lakecountyclerk.org/  

This outcome directly contradicts public statements that Gordon made claiming he prevailed in his lawsuit......in any capacity. In fact, court records indicate that no restitution was awarded, no sanctions enforced, no damages or monetary awards were granted to the plaintiff (see above). 

Almost two years ago, July 7th, 2023, Gordon stated online publicly on Facebook that he “won” his defamation case (see screencaps). 

However, the actual court records dont read the way Gordon spins it. 

The filings appear to show that Gordon’s own side didn’t even try to pretend Dale Dugas made this stuff up. Instead, they basically framed Dugas as exposing allegations about Gordon’s conduct, including references to Alabama investigations and fraudulent black belt rank claims

In real‑world terms, that’s not defamation; that’s someone holding up a mirror to Gordon's face and Gordon not liking it.  

In defamation law, there is a hard line between inventing a lie and bringing forward existing allegations backed by real legal scrutiny. If the plaintiff’s own pleadings keep talking about investigations and serious misconduct, they’re admitting in court that the allegations are relevant and NOT some elaborate slander fantasy cooked up by critics or as Gordon calls them, "his haters".

Then comes the ugly part Gordon doesn’t want anyone to notice. For more than five years, the plaintiffs served up zilch in actual proof of defamation and sweet nothing in hard evidence backing his own martial arts claims. By October 2025, the court had had enough and dropped a failure‑to‑prosecute notice on them. 

On May 8, 2026, the Lake County case 35‑2020‑CA‑001851 was dismissed and closed by the judge. No damages. No sanctions. No restitution. No money. No enforceable win. Just a case that flatlined on the docket.

So when Gordon struts around claiming that he “prevailed,” in his lawsuit, that statement is legally fictional. 

You can’t claim battlefield victory after your lawsuit got carried out in a body bag by the court. Apparently a court decision that is not to Gordon's liking just simply doesnt apply to him. 

What did actually win out here was the the clear paper trail: the filings show serious allegations were already on the table, countless times Gordon changed his story about his martial arts background, the defendant exposing them, and that the plaintiff ultimately failed to squeeze any real legal win out of the whole mess.

If Gordon wants to talk about how the case shook out, he should start with the docket, not his spin. The court file doesn’t lie — Gordon's PR story does.

Duct Tape and Delusion: The Problem With Fake Self-Defense

Every so often, a video surfaces that perfectly captures everything wrong with the modern “self-defense” industry. I recently came across one featuring Florida’s biggest Martial arts wannabe and lying ass fraud. Apparently this wannabe instructor thought it was a good idea to duct tape a child’s wrists together, place him in the trunk of a car, and present the entire scenario as a “self-defense escape drill.

Let’s be blunt: this isn’t just bad, it is unrealistic and totally irresponsible.

The setup itself is pulled straight from Hollywood fiction. The idea that someone will be neatly restrained, placed in a trunk alive and conscious, and then given the opportunity to calmly execute a practiced escape is fantasy. In real-world criminal cases, victims who are bound and placed in a vehicle trunk are typically already incapacitated or worse……dead. The grim reality is that compliance, control, and overwhelming force define these situations—not cinematic problem-solving.

There are several critical failures in this kind of “training.” First, it promotes the illusion that extreme, worst-case scenarios can be reliably escaped with a trick or technique. Second, it ignores the actual principles of self-defense: awareness, avoidance, boundary setting, and immediate resistance when appropriate. Third—and most concerning—it conditions students to believe that survival is a matter of performing the right move under perfect conditions, rather than understanding the chaos and brutality of real violence.

A legitimate instructor understands that self-defense begins long before physical contact. It’s about recognizing danger early, avoiding bad situations, and developing the mindset to act decisively when necessary. It is not about rehearsing abduction fantasies in controlled environments.

Even worse, using a child in this kind of demonstration shows a lack of judgment and professional ethics. Children trust instructors. Parents trust instructors. That trust should never be exploited to stage absurd, fear-based scenarios for attention or credibility.

If someone wants to teach practical self-defense, there are plenty of grounded, reality-based approaches: situational awareness drills, escape from common grabs, verbal boundary training, and age-appropriate physical responses. None of these require duct tape, car trunks, or theatrics.

At the end of the day, this kind of demonstration isn’t just ineffective—it’s misleading. And in the world of self-defense, misleading people can have serious consequences. Reality doesn’t care about your demo. Reality doesn’t follow a script.

And no amount of duct tape theatrics will change that. But what do you expect from a fraud whose videos showcase no expertise at any level just total incompetence and ineptitude on the subject matter. 

All you can do is Run, Hide and Disappear

 Make no mistake.....I want this understood.......a fat candy ass fraud and his accomplice are going to jail.....conspiracy to commit murder and solicitation to commit murder. Placing a bounty on me and my former student was not taken lightly....it was not a joke. You will see how funny jail will be you fucking coward and martial arts wannabe. 

AND for the rest of his cronies.....you will ALL be sued. Period. 

All any of you can do is run, hide and disappear. When it is all said and done....I will not be finished with you even then. 

To the Handful of People Facing Arrests and Civil Litigation

To the handful of people now looking at arrests and civil litigation for your criminal actions, this message is for you...... 

The legal process is in motion, and I am personally pursuing every available remedy under the law. Actions have consequences, and attempts to conceal your identity or evade accountability will not succeed. I mean just ask the person behind the Casper Mcfadden persona. 

Despite popular belief, burner phones and prepaid “TracFone” devices are not untraceable. They may offer short-term convenience and the illusion of anonymity, but modern digital forensics erase that illusion quickly. Each call, text, or data session connects through cellular towers that log IDENTIFYING data. 

This information can determine not only where a phone was used, but when, and in connection with which other devices. Law enforcement and private forensic analysts use this data to link individuals to criminal acts. Prepaid phone usage, far from being invisible, becomes one more thread of evidence that ties behavior to identity.

And in civil litigation, digital evidence plays an equally important role. Cell tower logs, message histories, and network activity can establish timelines of harassment, defamation, or fraud. When these records are combined they form a comprehensive body of proof, most importantly one that courts take seriously.

If you believe hiding behind technology protects you, consider this your wake‑up call. Your devices, your digital footprints, and your actions all tell the same story.....the truth always leaves a trail. Legal accountability is not hypothetical. It is actively in progress. 

You were told, I'm someone you don't fuck with. 

The Cost of Martial Arts Lies: How Martial Arts Lies Can Destroy Your Reputation, Career, and Your Life

In the martial arts world, reputation matters. People train hard for years to earn rank, develop skill, and build trust. When someone lies about their background, their rank, or their achievements, the damage is often far greater than they imagine.

A martial arts lie does not stay confined to the dojo. It spreads. It gets repeated. It gets archived online. And once the truth comes out, the lie can follow a person into their personal life, their business, and even a completely unrelated career.

In today’s world, where every claim can be fact-checked in seconds, honesty isn’t just a virtue—it’s a survival trait. In the martial arts, where personal honor and integrity form the foundation of practice, lying about rank or experience might seem like an easy shortcut to respect or recognition. But such deceit always exacts a heavy toll. Once exposed, the fallout can ruin reputations, destroy livelihoods, and haunt careers far beyond the dojo.

The Illusion of the “Martial Arts Shortcut”

A troubling pattern seen across the martial arts world involves individuals fabricating titles or lineages to inflate their worth. Take, for instance, the recurring case of the 30-year-old “grandmaster.” This kind of claim raises eyebrows immediately—earning a legitimate 8th or 9th dan takes decades of dedicated training, teaching, and community contribution. For someone barely into their thirties to hold such a title defies logic and tradition.

When peers and students begin asking questions—Who promoted this person? Where’s the documentation?—the façade crumbles. Screenshots, archived websites, and public records tell the truth faster than any rumor. What once seemed impressive now appears laughable, and worse, dishonest. That individual not only loses respect; they become an example of what not to be.

The Domino Effect of Exposure

Once these false claims surface, the effects spread quickly. Screenshots of inflated ranks or fake certificates circulate through martial arts forums and social media. Before long, local news or online watchdog groups may pick up the story. The “grandmaster” title becomes a curse word in their name’s search results, and their personal and professional life outside the martial arts often takes collateral damage.

Employers today routinely investigate digital footprints. Discovering that someone lied about credentials in the martial arts can cast doubt on every aspect of their character. If they’re dishonest about that, what else might they be lying about or hiding? Even professionals in unrelated careers—teachers, military members, law enforcement officers, or business owners—have lost jobs or promotions after such lies came to light.

The Ethical and Legal Consequences

Beyond moral failure, there’s potential legal risk. Claiming false titles or lineage to attract students, charge tuition, or solicit endorsements crosses into fraud. If a student is injured or deceived under false pretenses, civil consequences follow. Courts and employers view integrity as a transferable quality; once tarnished, it’s difficult to defend credibility in any context.

A Lesson for Every Martial Artist

Rank, belts, and titles are symbols; integrity is substance. A true martial artist understands that credibility is earned—not claimed—and takes decades to build but only seconds to lose. Those tempted to inflate themselves for recognition might remember the lesson of the 30 something year-old “grandmaster”: lies may buy attention, but truth always collects the payment.

About those Alabama Jails.....

Time spent inside Alabama’s jails and prisons is widely regarded as perilous, especially for those unaccustomed to hard violence or the harsh dynamics of confinement. Reports tell a consistent story: frequent beatings and sexual assaults are commonplace. Sexual abuse is often described as rampant. Sprawling open-dorm layouts leave weaker or non‑violent inmates almost entirely unprotected.

For anyone entering that system who exudes no real toughness (like a soft, little fat white guy), will find themselves at the mercy of men who have thrived in an environment ruled by intimidation, aggression, and sexual predation.