When bad-faith actors attempt to destroy a reputation built over four decades of martial arts instruction and verified public service, they rarely operate alone. They work in packs, hiding behind screens, relying on coordinated timing, and feeding off one another’s malicious energy.
On a single day, just hours apart, three individuals, Bret
Gordon, his instructor Steven Hatfield, and Daniel Duplantis, launched a
coordinated strike across multiple platforms to defame my character and
undermine my standing in the martial arts community.
This was a synchronized campaign designed to inflict maximum
professional and personal damage. The mechanics of this multi-pronged attack
relied on deliberate coordination, malicious libel, and shared assets across
different channels:
- The Dissemination of Expunged Records: An illegally obtained, 30-year-old expunged record—showing charges that were dropped and completely dismissed was disseminated via email under the subject line "Criminal record of conviction Barron Shepherd." This malicious libel was distributed directly to Gordon’s instructor, Steven Hatfield, his legal counsel, his black belt students, and sent to the NKJF by Duplantis. I now hold the email that was sent to every single member of Gordon’s circle.
- The
Direct Libel (Gordon): Bret Gordon posted directly to his personal
Facebook page, falsely alleging that I was a "convicted felon.”
- The
Organizational Attack (Duplantis): Daniel Duplantis made direct phone
calls and transmitted these false "convicted felon" claims and
emails directly to a national martial arts governing body (the NKJF) in a
malicious attempt to destroy my credentials and professional
relationships.
- The
Shared Asset & Coordinated Amplification (Hatfield):
Simultaneously, Gordon’s instructor, Steven Hatfield, joined the attack.
Proving beyond doubt that this was a planned, joint effort, both
Hatfield and Gordon used the exact same screenshot of a post containing my
picture in their Facebook posts. While Hatfield avoided using the word
"criminal" outright, he published this coordinated attack
referring to me as a "clown show" ("Every Clown Deserves a
Circus"). Worse, statements have been documented where Hatfield leveled
physical threats, declaring that someone—meaning me—was going to get hurt.
Under Florida civil law, a conspiracy requires a "meeting of the minds" to carry out an unlawful act. When three closely aligned individuals target the exact same person on the exact same day and when they circulate the same libelous subject lines, contact the same governing body that Hatfield and Gordon had just been booted out of, and deploy the exact same screenshots containing my image the law does not view it as random chance or a coincidence. It views it as undeniable proof of joint orchestration and shared campaign assets.
Hatfield labeling me a "clown" using the identical
screenshot Gordon deployed, was a strategic, synchronized
attempt to amplify a smear campaign. Hatfield’s post served as public cover and
coordination for the libel that his circle was pushing behind the scenes.
They executed this strike believing that operating across
different mediums social media posts, private emails, and phone calls, would
shield them from collective liability.
They were wrong.
Under the doctrine of civil conspiracy, when individuals act
in concert to commit tortious acts,
joint liability attaches. Every participant becomes legally answerable for the
harm caused by the entire group.
Duplantis has already faced a formal military action for
his misconduct and my civil action is forthcoming. Gordon and Hatfield’s flagship legal assault has collapsed into
a permanent Dismissal With Prejudice accompanied by bad-faith court sanctions
(§ 57.105). And the evidentiary trail, from identical shared digital assets and
forwarded email records to matching timestamps, is fully documented.
The complete, undeniable proof of their
conspiracy has been handed to me by someone looking to escape legal action by pointing fingers at others. NO apology or any amount of finger pointing is going to work..... EVERY single person involved will answer for it in a court of
law.
