Formal Notice: Imminent Service of Process

Legal counsel has confirmed that formal paperwork is finalized and service of this lawsuit is forthcoming.

Capt. or former Capt. DD (USAF); 

I will show you a small measure of respect by not using your full name at this time. Beyond that, this civil action will seek maximum formal damages for defamation, along side intentional and malicious interference with professional relations. The lawsuit directly addresses your purposeful and outright malicious misrepresentations as well as the deliberate fabrication of your own claimed martial arts ranks.

The Paper Trail Doesn't Lie: Inside the Dismissal of Bret Gordon’s Defamation Lawsuit

When a civil lawsuit concludes, the public is often left with two competing narratives: the spin broadcasted on social media, and the cold, hard reality documented in the court docket. Recent filings from the Lake County courthouse have laid bare the definitive end to a bitter, five-year legal battle—and the results completely contradict Gordon's public narrative of some sort of battlefield victory.

On May 8, 2026, Lake County Case Number 35‑2020‑CA‑001851—the defamation suit levied by self proclaimed martial arts figure Bret Gordon against critic Dale Dugas—was officially dismissed and closed by the presiding judge. Despite public claims by Gordon dating back to July 2023 that he had "won" or "prevailed" in the matter, the actual court records paint a starkly different picture: an enforceable win never happened. There was no restitution awarded, no sanctions enforced against the defendant, and zero damages or monetary awards granted to the plaintiff.

The case simply flatlined. 

An Admission in the Pleadings

The unraveling of the lawsuit began long before the final gavel fell. According to court filings dated February 27, 2026, the plaintiff’s own legal team effectively dismantled their own case for defamation.

In defamation law, a strict boundary exists between fabricating a malicious lie and bringing forward existing allegations wrapped in legitimate legal scrutiny. In these filings, Gordon's counsel acknowledged that the defendant, Dale Dugas, was raising allegations of unlawful conduct as part of his defense and public criticism. Strikingly, the filings framed Dugas’s actions not as inventing a slanderous fantasy, but as "outing" or disclosing existing information.

Attorneys are bound by strict ethical requirements of candor to the court. They cannot plausibly present a client as entirely free of legal issues while simultaneously managing active allegations of criminal conduct. Because the plaintiff's own submissions repeatedly referenced investigations by Alabama authorities and heavily scrutinized fraudulent black belt rank claims, the lawsuit itself admitted that these controversies were relevant and grounded in real-world scrutiny—not cooked up by "haters." 

In short, Dugas hadn't defamed Gordon; he had held up a mirror to Gordon's actual background.

Five Years of Silence

For more than five years, the lawsuit languished on the docket. Throughout this extensive timeline, the plaintiffs failed to produce any evidence whatsoever of actual defamation, nor did they provide any proof backing Gordon's numerous public martial arts pedigree claims. They simply ignored filings made by the defendant, leaving them unanswered and uncontested. 

Those uncontested filings showed Gordon changing his martial arts background story every time it was questioned and or debunked. Those uncontested filings now stand as a matter of record....proving Gordon was not forthcoming with any proof of any ranks he claimed to possess. 

By October 2025, the court’s patience had run out. A formal Notice of Failure to Prosecute was issued to the plaintiffs. The legal clock was ticking, and the case was already on life support.

Playing Fire with the Court: Contempt and Fraud Allegations

The final act of this litigation highlights a massive legal miscalculation that extends far beyond a simple loss. When a civil suit ends, the parties typically reach a compromise, a settlement is drawn up, and the case is quietly dismissed. However, following an agreement, Gordon reportedly refused to sign the final paperwork in a last-ditch effort to keep the litigation alive or circumvent the terms.

In a court of law, this maneuver is not a loophole—it is a trapdoor. By turning a routine settlement closure into a direct standoff with the judiciary, the plaintiffs have opened the door to severe institutional backlash. Because the plaintiff refused to honor a court-mandated settlement after agreeing to the terms on the record, the timeline has shifted from standard civil bickering into a direct conflict with the authority of the bench.

Consequently, the plaintiffs are now potentially staring down severe legal exposure:

Contempt of Court Sanctions: Intentionally violating an agreement or obstructing a court mandate can result in heavy financial penalties, assignment of the opposing side's attorney fees, and disciplinary actions.

Fraud upon the Court: By allegedly fabricating a narrative, lacking any evidentiary backing for five years, and attempting to circumvent agreed-upon settlement terms, the behavior edges into "fraud upon the court"—a serious offense involving conduct that intentionally defiles the integrity of the judicial system.

Because Gordon refused to cooperate, the judge ultimately took the wheel, bypassed the plaintiffs entirely, and shut the case down. The lawsuit will likely now add dismissed with prejudice, meaning it is permanently closed and can never be refiled.

The Takeaway

If the plaintiffs in this case attempt to revive the exact same dispute by altering the wording, going after someone else, or filing under a different name, the defense will immediately present the prior dismissal. Under the doctrine of res judicata (claim preclusion), the judge will promptly throw the new case out because the matter has already received a final judgment.

Furthermore, individuals who habitually file baseless, previously dismissed actions risk being designated as "vexatious litigants." Such a label legally restricts them from filing any future lawsuits without first obtaining explicit permission from a judge.

The Bottom Line

This specific legal battle is officially over, and hiring new counsel cannot grant the plaintiffs a do-over. 

Ultimately, the official court docket tells the definitive story. The plaintiffs were not denied due process; they had five years to produce supporting evidence and failed to do so. This extensive paper trail leaves zero room for public relations spin: the allegations lacked substance, the defense was entirely justified, and the lawsuit was conclusively dismantled.

UPDATE: Critical Agreement Requirement – Dismissal With Prejudice Within Ten Days

The settlement agreement in this case was signed by the plaintiffs and appears to have been submitted to the court on June 5, 2026, and it includes a specific, binding obligation: the plaintiffs must submit a dismissal with prejudice within ten days of the entrance of the agreement. This is not a suggestion or a courtesy request— The plaintiff's submission of a dismissal with prejudice is a court-enforceable mandate.

The plaintiffs cannot and should not attempt to construe or spin this case as a win.

Any attempt by the plaintiffs to claim they won this case is factually untrue. The case was dismissed—not won. There was no restitution awarded, no damages granted, and no sanctions enforced against the defendant. If they claim the court ruled in their favor, that is also false. The judge unilaterally dismissed the case after the plaintiffs failed to prosecute for five years, not because the court found in their favor.

If they threaten that they will sue again, that is equally untrue. A dismissal with prejudice bars refiling the same claim under the legal doctrine of res judicata, meaning the matter is permanently closed. The court already determined that criticisms about Gordon's martial arts background were not defamation (because they disclosed existing allegations, not fabricated lies), that same issue can't be re-litigated in a new lawsuit against someone else.

If the plaintiff’s try to downplay this as just a procedural setback, that is not a factual statement either. This is a permanent, final judgment on the merits.

And if they claim they won sanctions or were awarded money, that is pure fiction—zero monetary awards or sanctions were granted to the plaintiffs. Every one of these claims would be easily disproven by reviewing the official court docket.

Verifying the Facts

The court docket showing the entire official case history is a matter of public record. Anyone can independently review and verify these filings directly through the Lake County Clerk of Courts portal at https://courtrecords.lakecountyclerk.org/ click on case search at top of page and put in case number 35‑2020‑CA‑001851.

The Legal Reckoning for the Blackbelts of a Clermont area Martial Arts Fraud

ARTICLE DROPPING SOON......

Statement on Legal Action to Protect My Reputation

I am pursuing legal remedies regarding slanderous defamatory statements made about me in Septemberof 2025. Anyone who directly or indirectly participated in spreading false claims will be named as appropriate under the law. I will not discuss specifics publicly, other than to say the following: 

The appropriate filings and notices to be served are forthcoming. 

This action is intended to hold accountable those who disseminated false and damaging information in an attempt to assassinate my credentials and reputation. Those who acted directly, and those who aided or encouraged the spread of these statements, will be included in the litigation where the law permits. 

I take this seriously and will pursue justice through the courts. Those who chose to spread false claims either directly or indirectly, should understand that their actions have consequences under both civil and criminal law. 

I will not settle with any of those involved. I will NOT settle for anything less than the maximum relief such civil and criminal litigation actions will allow. 

DEFAMATION SUIT DISMISSED

In filings in Bret Gordon’s defamation suit dated February 27, 2026, the plaintiff’s  effectively acknowledges that the defendant, Dale Dugas, raised allegations of Bret Gordon’s alleged unlawful conduct as part of his defense and criticism. The filing notably frames Dale Dugas’s actions as “outing” or bringing forward this information, rather than inventing it, or actual defamation. This is an important distinction that ties the disputed statements directly to claims about Gordon’s own conduct.

Attorneys are ethically required to present facts to the court with candor. Accordingly, plaintiff’s counsel could not plausibly portray Gordon as free of relevant legal issues while simultaneously addressing allegations involving criminal conduct or ongoing investigations. The filing itself references investigations by Alabama authorities multiple times, underscoring their relevance to the case.

In effect, the plaintiff’s own submissions placed before the court the existence of serious allegations and legal scrutiny, while characterizing the defendant’s role as one of disclosure rather than fabrication or defamation.

For over 5 years the Plaintiffs produced no evidence of actual defamation nor any proof of the plaintiff's many martial arts claims in their own defamation suit. 

In October of 2025 a notice of Failure to Prosecute was issued to the plaintiff's by the courts. 

According to court records, 5/8/2026, Gordons lawsuit, Lake County case number 35‑2020‑CA‑001851, was dismissed and closed by the judge (see below). Follow Link below and search records by using above case number ; https://courtrecords.lakecountyclerk.org/  

This outcome directly contradicts public statements that Gordon made claiming he prevailed in his lawsuit......in any capacity. In fact, court records indicate that no restitution was awarded, no sanctions enforced, no damages or monetary awards were granted to the plaintiff (see above). 

Almost two years ago, July 7th, 2023, Gordon stated online publicly on Facebook that he “won” his defamation case (see screencaps). 

However, the actual court records dont read the way Gordon spins it. 

The filings appear to show that Gordon’s own side didn’t even try to pretend Dale Dugas made this stuff up. Instead, they basically framed Dugas as exposing allegations about Gordon’s conduct, including references to Alabama investigations and fraudulent black belt rank claims

In real‑world terms, that’s not defamation; that’s someone holding up a mirror to Gordon's face and Gordon not liking it.  

In defamation law, there is a hard line between inventing a lie and bringing forward existing allegations backed by real legal scrutiny. If the plaintiff’s own pleadings keep talking about investigations and serious misconduct, they’re admitting in court that the allegations are relevant and NOT some elaborate slander fantasy cooked up by critics or as Gordon calls them, "his haters".

Then comes the ugly part Gordon doesn’t want anyone to notice. For more than five years, the plaintiffs served up zilch in actual proof of defamation and sweet nothing in hard evidence backing his own martial arts claims. By October 2025, the court had had enough and dropped a failure‑to‑prosecute notice on them. 

On May 8, 2026, the Lake County case 35‑2020‑CA‑001851 was dismissed and closed by the judge. No damages. No sanctions. No restitution. No money. No enforceable win. Just a case that flatlined on the docket.

So when Gordon struts around claiming that he “prevailed,” in his lawsuit, that statement is legally fictional. 

You can’t claim battlefield victory after your lawsuit got carried out in a body bag by the court. Apparently a court decision that is not to Gordon's liking just simply doesnt apply to him. 

What did actually win out here was the the clear paper trail: the filings show serious allegations were already on the table, countless times Gordon changed his story about his martial arts background, the defendant exposing them, and that the plaintiff ultimately failed to squeeze any real legal win out of the whole mess.

If Gordon wants to talk about how the case shook out, he should start with the docket, not his spin. The court file doesn’t lie — Gordon's PR story does.

Duct Tape and Delusion: The Problem With Fake Self-Defense

Every so often, a video surfaces that perfectly captures everything wrong with the modern “self-defense” industry. I recently came across one featuring Florida’s biggest Martial arts wannabe and lying ass fraud. Apparently this wannabe instructor thought it was a good idea to duct tape a child’s wrists together, place him in the trunk of a car, and present the entire scenario as a “self-defense escape drill.

Let’s be blunt: this isn’t just bad, it is unrealistic and totally irresponsible.

The setup itself is pulled straight from Hollywood fiction. The idea that someone will be neatly restrained, placed in a trunk alive and conscious, and then given the opportunity to calmly execute a practiced escape is fantasy. In real-world criminal cases, victims who are bound and placed in a vehicle trunk are typically already incapacitated or worse……dead. The grim reality is that compliance, control, and overwhelming force define these situations—not cinematic problem-solving.

There are several critical failures in this kind of “training.” First, it promotes the illusion that extreme, worst-case scenarios can be reliably escaped with a trick or technique. Second, it ignores the actual principles of self-defense: awareness, avoidance, boundary setting, and immediate resistance when appropriate. Third—and most concerning—it conditions students to believe that survival is a matter of performing the right move under perfect conditions, rather than understanding the chaos and brutality of real violence.

A legitimate instructor understands that self-defense begins long before physical contact. It’s about recognizing danger early, avoiding bad situations, and developing the mindset to act decisively when necessary. It is not about rehearsing abduction fantasies in controlled environments.

Even worse, using a child in this kind of demonstration shows a lack of judgment and professional ethics. Children trust instructors. Parents trust instructors. That trust should never be exploited to stage absurd, fear-based scenarios for attention or credibility.

If someone wants to teach practical self-defense, there are plenty of grounded, reality-based approaches: situational awareness drills, escape from common grabs, verbal boundary training, and age-appropriate physical responses. None of these require duct tape, car trunks, or theatrics.

At the end of the day, this kind of demonstration isn’t just ineffective—it’s misleading. And in the world of self-defense, misleading people can have serious consequences. Reality doesn’t care about your demo. Reality doesn’t follow a script.

And no amount of duct tape theatrics will change that. But what do you expect from a fraud whose videos showcase no expertise at any level just total incompetence and ineptitude on the subject matter. 

All you can do is Run, Hide and Disappear

 Make no mistake.....I want this understood.......a fat candy ass fraud and his accomplice are going to jail.....conspiracy to commit murder and solicitation to commit murder. Placing a bounty on me and my former student was not taken lightly....it was not a joke. You will see how funny jail will be you fucking coward and martial arts wannabe. 

AND for the rest of his cronies.....you will ALL be sued. Period. 

All any of you can do is run, hide and disappear. When it is all said and done....I will not be finished with you even then.